Skip to main content

The Impact of Learning Communities on Equitable and Quality-Driven Research Cultures


Learning communities can be built around both institutional and inter-institutional goals and target populations. Within institutions, current voices can be supplemented by purposive expansions through cohort hires and other strategies to foster inclusive, and usually, interdisciplinary conversations. In addition to multiple disciplines, multiple institutional roles are often usefully present in the learning communities that effect institutional change. The dialogue across, rather than among, supposed interests also encourages plain speaking and a focus on “facts” of the situation.

Strategies for avoiding the reproduction of inequities in learning communities include: intentionally bring in a variety of experiences and views; make sure there’s a seat for everyone, open dialogue, identify and address barriers to participation (e.g., provide financial or in-kind compensation like time off work or course release time).

Possibilities for impacting change include: creating new policies and recommendations, creating low-commitment opportunities for participation, hosting public events, encouraging both top-down and bottom-up participation. Participants said they thought avoiding inequity and impacting change kind of blended together in our discussion.

For allyship, one strategy is to attract hesitant participants (who might be precisely who needs to be involved in these discussions) by targeting role models, mentors and distinguished professionals who can demonstrate that this work is valuable and needed.

To leverage power, learning communities can ally with students and collect data from them as well as all employee categories at the institution (don’t leave anyone out). Be strategic about process; e.g., provide a narrower vision at first to focus the group, then expand the vision as the group learns more. The nature of the community may change from more homogenous membership for affinity to a more heterogeneous membership for bridging. Use scaffolding: start at one level of the institution, then move up to the next level, and so on.

Learning communities are a broad and flexible category — they don’t have to be formally convened to be effective. Their subject matter can be varied and can evolve over time. They can be about learning new things (ex., teaching online, teaching graduate courses; discovering new research methodologies, etc.) or about building community (creating a sense of belonging; providing support, etc.).

At the Privileged Logics 2024 Conference, successful outcomes of some learning communities were shared and included: creating resources for student success; leading to a discussion of how to treat the issue of sex/gender in a bio class; including updating lab manuals; changing the way a forensic scientist classified gender as “with or without a Y chromosome”; helping international students become more competitive for summer teaching assignments; and helping folks understand the need for professional development around how to talk with and listen to underrepresented students struggling with recent hate crimes.

Comments

Most Popular Posts

How Current Scientific Cultures and Metrics Reproduce Privilege

At the Privileged Logics 2024 conference, there was broad agreement that metrics currently used are unfair and reproduce privilege. Reasons include adherence to a competitive scientific culture, perceptions that these metrics are objective, their usefulness in appealing to outsiders for engagement and recruitment, and inertia and/or mistaken notions of rigor from those who have been at the institution for a long time and don’t want to change the way things are done. Examples of metrics that have affected outcomes for individuals due to privilege included: The demand for novelty and transformation (although there can also be an anti-innovation bias denying merit to delivery modes such as podcasts as well as to core expanding substantive areas and a focus on community impact) over replication and incremental gains Statistical significance as a measure for worthwhile research Tenure as a status attached to financial stability Grades as measures of learning and achievement Differential tre...

Privileged Logics 2024 Conference: Highlights from a Research Ethics Workshop

  At the Privileged Logics 2024 Conference, various participants shared what was being done at their institutions regarding research ethics. Training ranged from nothing and bare minimum CITI modules focused on compliance for those with federally funded grants, to monthly town halls and resources provided across campus. Some included weekly face-to-face trainings to supplement CITI required courses for all researchers, whether or not they are federally funded. The most comprehensive program resulted from disciplinary action by a federal granting agency. Examples of research ethics topics most directly related to privilege included sexual harassment and Indigenous student mentoring. But there was wide agreement that the orientation to understanding and addressing privilege was largely absent from most institutional training. A narrow focus on research integrity ignores the social benefits of research and equity and generally leads to rather superficial topics and a focus on com...

Introducing the Privileged Logics Blog

Welcome to the Privileged Logics Blog!  Purpose of the Blog: Welcome to the Privileged Logics blog! Our blog serves as a platform for continued conversations surrounding privilege in STEM research and research ethics training . Our goal is to foster a community where researchers, educators, administrators, and stakeholders can come together to share resources, ideas, and insights on promoting equity and inclusion in STEM fields and in research ethics training.  About Privileged Logics 2024: Privileged Logics 2024 was a one-day conference held on February 25, 2024, funded by the National Science Foundation (Award Number 2316197). The conference examined the foundations of privilege in STEM research and research ethics, explored promising practices, and inspired participants to redefine research quality, ethics, and opportunity in STEM fields.  Privilege is a complex system of power that can manifest in various aspects of STEM research, from biases in peer review to dispa...