Skip to main content

WMU Ethics Center Announces Keynote Speaker on Privilege in Research Ethics


KALAMAZOO, Mich.—Western Michigan University’s Center for the Study of Ethics in Society has announced the keynote speaker for a National Science Foundation-funded conference Feb. 25 in Cincinnati.

Sarina Saturn, Ph.D., editor of the ADVANCE Journal for Individual and Institutional Transformation for Social Justice, will headline the one-day conference focused on privilege in research ethics titled “Privileged Logics: Interrogating Foundations and Practices in Research Ethics.”

NSF awarded the Ethics Center $49,792 for a one-year grant to plan and host the conference in cooperation with the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics.

A neuroscientist and social justice advocate, Saturn devotes her time educating communities on LGBTQ2SIA+ and other minority groups’ trauma healing and growth. She currently serves as the director of strategic partnerships at OEA Choice Trust. She has extensive education and research experience as an associate professor at the University of Portland and Oregon State University, as a community research evaluation scientist at the Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Health Authority, and as a presenter and facilitator to diverse audiences.

Privileged Logics 2024 aims to raise awareness about issues of privilege in research ethics, generate useful concepts for understanding them, and identify broadly applicable recommendations for addressing them that build on inclusive mentoring and other promising practices that already exist in research ethics. This project promotes fairness and equity in science, in alignment with NSF’s mission, by expanding knowledge about the negative impacts of privilege in research and identifying effective strategies for mitigating them.  

A goal of the conference is to assemble a network of experts who want to develop a standard ethical and responsible research (ER2) proposal using ideas from the conference to generate new topics in ER2 and new standards for STEM research and RCR training.

The conference format will use focused workshop conversations around successful strategies for remedying biases and removing barriers resulting from privilege in STEM research.   

The conference will run from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Hilton Cincinnati Netherland Plaza. Limited space is available to attend and participate in workshop discussions. To apply, complete this online form. Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis until Feb. 2 or until all slots are filled.

To learn more about the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, visit wmich.edu/ethics.

About the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society

In August 1985, the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society was created after WMU faculty across the curriculum met to discuss their common interests in studying and teaching ethics. Each academic year, the center sponsors 15 to 20 public presentations addressing a wide range of ethical issues. Originally sponsored by WMU’s Graduate College, the center is now housed in the College of Arts and Sciences.

For more WMU news, arts and events, visit WMU News online.

Labels:

Comments

  1. ElysiaFebruary 6, 2026 at 9:27 AM

    This thoughtful announcement about the WMU Ethics Center keynote highlights important conversations on privilege, equity, and ethical practice that shape how we think about fairness and human experience in research and life. For individuals navigating complex emotional or relationship challenges, connecting with a marriage counselor in cincinnati like Life Success Counseling can provide compassionate guidance and practical support grounded in ethical care. Professional support from a trusted counselor complements the values of reflection, resilience, and meaningful growth shared in this post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Privileged Logics 2024 Conference: Highlights from a Research Ethics Workshop

  At the Privileged Logics 2024 Conference, various participants shared what was being done at their institutions regarding research ethics. Training ranged from nothing and bare minimum CITI modules focused on compliance for those with federally funded grants, to monthly town halls and resources provided across campus. Some included weekly face-to-face trainings to supplement CITI required courses for all researchers, whether or not they are federally funded. The most comprehensive program resulted from disciplinary action by a federal granting agency. Examples of research ethics topics most directly related to privilege included sexual harassment and Indigenous student mentoring. But there was wide agreement that the orientation to understanding and addressing privilege was largely absent from most institutional training. A narrow focus on research integrity ignores the social benefits of research and equity and generally leads to rather superficial topics and a focus on com...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Impact of Learning Communities on Equitable and Quality-Driven Research Cultures

Learning communities can be built around both institutional and inter-institutional goals and target populations. Within institutions, current voices can be supplemented by purposive expansions through cohort hires and other strategies to foster inclusive, and usually, interdisciplinary conversations. In addition to multiple disciplines, multiple institutional roles are often usefully present in the learning communities that effect institutional change. The dialogue across, rather than among, supposed interests also encourages plain speaking and a focus on “facts” of the situation. Strategies for avoiding the reproduction of inequities in learning communities include: intentionally bring in a variety of experiences and views; make sure there’s a seat for everyone, open dialogue, identify and address barriers to participation (e.g., provide financial or in-kind compensation like time off work or course release time). Possibilities for impacting change include: creating new policies and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Current Scientific Cultures and Metrics Reproduce Privilege

At the Privileged Logics 2024 conference, there was broad agreement that metrics currently used are unfair and reproduce privilege. Reasons include adherence to a competitive scientific culture, perceptions that these metrics are objective, their usefulness in appealing to outsiders for engagement and recruitment, and inertia and/or mistaken notions of rigor from those who have been at the institution for a long time and don’t want to change the way things are done. Examples of metrics that have affected outcomes for individuals due to privilege included: The demand for novelty and transformation (although there can also be an anti-innovation bias denying merit to delivery modes such as podcasts as well as to core expanding substantive areas and a focus on community impact) over replication and incremental gains Statistical significance as a measure for worthwhile research Tenure as a status attached to financial stability Grades as measures of learning and achievement Differential tre...
Post a Comment
Read more